The most famous balances ( ) will be Cheating Trouble Survey (IDQ; Buss ainsi que al
In terms of aspect regarding personal envy, regarding forty thinking-statement tool had been claimed since creation of the fresh new Care about-Report and you may Projective Envy Scales ( Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979 ). Of many devices were used only when. , 1992 ) designed to determine gender distinctions; the latest Multidimensional Jealousy Level ( Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989 ) developed to measure the around three proportions of jealousy (intellectual, psychological and behavioral dimensions); new Twitter Envy Scale ( Muise, Christofides, & De l’ensemble des ) aimed at evaluating the chances of an event that creates thinking of jealousy members connected with their craft into Facebook; brand new Envy Scale ( Buunk, 1997 ), familiar with take a look at around three types of envy (activated, anxious and you may precautionary) together with Interpersonal Jealousy Scale (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981 ), and that evaluates the fresh new bad emotion due to genuine otherwise threatened losses from a loved individual a competitor. All tools mentioned above have demostrated enough degrees of authenticity and you may accuracy.
Mathes and you may Severa (1981) introduce one or two knowledge, as well as the very first study performed the construction of your own level with 39 products, that has been reduced so you’re able to 28 circumstances once analytical investigation
Inside Mexico, a great Multidimensional Measure of Envy ( Diaz-Enjoying, Rivera, & Flores, 1989 ) has been elaborated and you can a preliminary investigation are completed with the latest Multidimensional Index out-of Intimate Envy ( Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016 ). Within the Brazil, this new Intimate Jealousy List is modified ( Bueno & Carvalho, 2012 ) In terms of Colombia, there aren’t any psychometric studies from a particular size on personal envy. On the other hand, earlier training don’t manage Factorial Confirmatory Analysis (CFA) so as to corroborate the newest foundation build found, and you will low reliability membership were utilized in its items (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) or small trials were used (Mota mais aussi al., 2016).
In the Latin american context, there can be a variation into the Chile of one’s Inventory of Practices of the Partners That cause Envy ( Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014 )
The latest IJS set-up having Mathes and you may Severa (1981) the most utilized bills to own evaluating intimate envy, it found six facts one to evaluate the sensitivity so you can risks associated to: (a) Partner’s infidelity and relationships anybody else (facts step 1, 3, a dozen, 14, fifteen, 16, 20, twenty-two, 23, and you may twenty-five); (b) Lover’s dominance (issues 2, step 3, 4, seven, ten, 13, 17, 20, and you can 23); (c) An enthusiastic untrustworthy mate (factors step 1, cuatro, 6, 19, and you may 21); (d) Lover’s dated times (facts 11, 24, twenty six, twenty seven, and 28); (e) Lover’s apathy (affairs 8, nine and you can 24); and you may (f) Partner’s kept nearest and dearest which have dated dates and you will sex distinctions (things 5 and you can 18).
You’ll find four education having looked at regarding the reliability and you will authenticity. Then, within the another studies, IJS was used next to almost every other bills one evaluated intimate love-links, insecurity, self-value and you may an ad hoc survey away from independent identities, guaranteeing, considering concept, the sophisticated of envy, the better the degree of Intimate like in addition to lower new independent title of your own pair. Within this data, i report a great coefficient from reliability away from .92 for the total scale. In a 3rd analysis, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you can Penis (1982) , in order to increase new indicators off legitimacy, utilized the IJS as well as 2 behavioural actions: (a) danger when confronted by a competition and (b) phrases out-of possessiveness toward spouse, thanks to a call which they designed to the one who took part in the study. New expected correlations was basically gotten, hence again served new authenticity of GrДЌka aplikacija za upoznavanje USA your level. In the long run, for the a fourth study, Mathes, Roter and Joerger (1982) substantiated brand new convergent authenticity away from IJS with other bills you to examined personal envy.
