Religiosity try seen to be the best predictor out of intimate bias inside our analyses

Ergo, we restricted our very own analyses to participants’ perceptions with the homosexual people, instead of specific attitude evaluations anywhere between homosexual everyone

Really Puerto Ricans pursue specific interpretation of your Christian heritage. Given Christianity’s posture toward homosexuality due to the fact a wicked lifestyle, this is not shocking discover a strong negative organization between religiosity and intimate bias (Diaz, 1998; Supplier, 1995). Additionally, we requested whether religiosity you’ll increase sexual bias by the expanding participants’ ethical resistance to activate that have homosexual individuals and/or understand any relationships which have gay folks since the self-confident. However, an architectural design having religiosity predicting sexual prejudice with the most other study variables try seen to be unsound and you may erratic. Therefore, we really do not faith religiosity ‘s the driving basis for everyone almost every other studies variables. Whenever you are an input to reduce individuals’ religiosity is actually dishonest, i do recommend unlock conversations out-of Christianity’s stance for the sexual direction rather than gay routines in this religious settings (Choice, Serafini, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1994). Such issues can get reduce Puerto Rican’s negative attitudes for the gay people and you can women by detatching the main focus of stigma from the homosexual private so you can a particular intimate choices.

Fundamentally, we found no sex variations in the fresh relationships ranging from intimate bias and research details. Still, its lack of intercourse variation tends to be due to all of our measurement regarding sexual bias. The distinctions when you look at the product articles within our ATL and ATG subscales build appropriate evaluations between them subscales unfeasible. Earlier education searching for gender variations in thinking to your homosexuality adjusted the fresh ATLG goods wording is similar with the exception of new resource class (we.e., “[Male/Female] homosexuality are a good perversion.”) (Herek, 2002a). On the other hand, perhaps the variations in intimate bias for our studies people are perhaps not because of a gender dichotomy but so you’re able to distinctions round the sex spots (Sakalli, 2002). Guys which have deeper salience during the machismo plus the attitudes from manliness will be render higher sexual prejudice certainly men (Cunningham, 1998). Coming browse will be explore exactly how item text, social philosophy, and sex differences ong Puerto Ricans.

Still, evaluations ranging from all of our model and also the choice model recommend that religiosity, self-confident experiences having gay people, and you will amount of affairs which have gay males and you may lesbian predict intimate prejudice a lot better than the newest choice causal channel

Our very own investigation has several limitations. Very first, the brand new study’s cross-sectional analysis minimal the organization temporal ordering of your variables. Upcoming lookup would be to speak about the latest causal relationship within study details. Second, monetary and investment constraints reduced all of our power to gather a much bigger sample. A more impressive decide to try that can be split up during the random halves will get support a lot more modifications as generated on a single half of the latest shot, whenever you are assessment this new fully-altered model regarding other haphazard 50 % of. Third, analysis findings tends to be low-generalizable to have Puerto Rican low-college populations. Even when people featured encouraged to participate in the study, earlier in the day browse receive individuals with reasonable informative attainment often score large towards the sexual prejudice (Herek, 2002). Next, i didn’t determine in the event the participants interacted having gay people otherwise lesbians just who notice-revealed its sexual positioning or if it believed some men and you will people had been homosexuals. 5th, our failure to evaluate what number of people missing within this for each class room in questionnaire limits the brand new comparison from possible exposure biases. Nevertheless, because research collection happened at the beginning of the fresh new session, we feel the possibilities of dropouts and you may students maybe not probably lecture could have decreased. In the end, religiosity’s effect on intimate bias is definitely worth deeper mining. The study are not able to gather information regarding participants’ spiritual associations. Given the variety out of Religious way of life (85% Roman Catholic and you can 15% Protestant and other; CIA Community Factbook (2005)), future knowledge would be to explore if or not religiosity’s affect intimate bias varies from the spiritual way of life.