The question of your legality of your Rev

1857.

3rd.-The latest 4th wedding from Court “Crown and Anchor” Good.O.F. was recognized of the a food on Bro. Franklin’s, Hall Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood occupied the latest couch, therefore are reported that this new Courtroom upcoming contains 90 players.

Jan

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, R. R. B. Norman, Burton, and you may J. Bayly was actually select new people in individuals Collection Committee.

p. 207 You out of a whale, that has been pulled during the Winterton, was being displayed on the Chapel Plain.

The latest Rev. W. D. Go, brand new minister out of St. Mary’s, Southtown, got, before you leave Southsea, come offered a handbag regarding ?61.

twenty-first.-New “Sisters” got within the collision having one of the stone piers out of the fresh new Link, it had a lot more damaged.

Feb. fourth.-An enthusiastic Anti-Taxation fulfilling was actually stored on City Hallway. Brand new Gran presided, additionally the pursuing the participated in what is going on:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, Roentgen. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you will J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer looked like the latest mover contained in this number.

Feb. twenty-first.-A “Poor’s Rates” appointment is stored in the Masonic Hallway. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you will an answer protesting from the 1s. 6d. quarterly rate try followed. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Royal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and F. Starling spoke on the subject, since conduct of your Guardians was defended because of the Mr. J. H. Harrison, one of several Board.

Feb. 25th.-A situation and therefore excited considerable attract, ended up being heard in the State Legal, Tolhouse-hallway, till the Court (T. J. Birch, Esq.) This new plaintiff are Mr. John Cobb, leather-based vendor, to own exactly who Mr. C. H. Chamberlin appeared; the defendants had been Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you may G. D. Palmer, have been illustrated of the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The plaintiff reported that he had been a candidate towards workplace away from Councillor toward age particularly during the solicitation away from Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and you will G. D. Palmer. At that time he became a candidate he distinctly told them he wouldn’t pay out away from his very own pouch a whole lot more than ?ten towards expenses of one’s election, and it also is actually knew the Liberal cluster, to which he belonged, would subscribe the rest. The night time till the election the guy obtained an offer of exactly what the costs was likely to be, and also in result of that he simultaneously watched both Mr. Burroughs and you may Mr. G. D. Palmer. You to definitely estimate, he considered, amounted to on the ?forty-five, because the memberships entirely amounted to however, ?42. Shortly after certain dialogue it wanted to keep your simple of your own amount of the expense which could exceed the sum of the authorized, and then he and you can Mr. Burroughs next went p. 208 on the Panel-space of your own North-ward, where Mr. Burroughs said they’d produced preparations for their friend John Cobb effective the business-ward. The expense of the election, he (the fresh plaintiff) shed, amounted altogether to help you ?58 1s. 7d. The balance, ergo, which he now reported regarding defendants was ?sixteen 1s. 7d.-The latest plaintiff, from https://getbride.org/islantilaiset-naiset/ inside the mix-test by the Mr. Cufaude, admitted you to definitely ?39 of your entire amount is actually getting – -.-Mr. Cufaude contended that when, as the plaintiff said, the new defendants got offered your a pledge towards the excess expenses, new ensure ought to are located in creating. And you may, of course evidence was genuine, hence, not, the guy disputed, it absolutely was impossible towards the plaintiff to recuperate, inasmuch when he himself got greeting that a large part out-of the entire expenditures is getting – -, which was an unlawful work.-Mr. Chamberlin contended that plaintiff, just after searching new guarantee on the defendants, acted only up on the trust of that guarantee, which thus, as they had registered through to an involvement to blow the bucks, they certainly were accountable. The money, additionally, had not been spent from the plaintiff, but from the panel designated to perform the brand new election, and you may before the election is more than, the newest plaintiff wasn’t conscious that some of the currency got been invested inside the – -.-Their Honor told you it had been clear the verify must have been on paper. He was off advice, in addition to, the plaintiff wasn’t destined to pay the illegal charge, and consequently he may maybe not bring his step for the money he claimed.-Brand new plaintiff try, appropriately, non-ideal.