Relationships deals manage usually mean the period of time during the and that amarriage must have taken put

1. Yet, within the genealogy and family history, we all knowthat each signal there clearly was a different. A vexing part ofgenealogy is the fact no one really understands just how to apply brand new exclusions orrules with people decisive adjective like constantly, perhaps, most likely,more than likely, etcetera. It might be fascinating if here almost every other instances ofjointures becoming generated annually otherwise several just after a well-known wedding big date.

dos. Can there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation to your marriage from ElizabethClifford and you will Sir Ralph Bowes have been 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise last cousins, immediately following removed from the brand new fifth LordClifford? Who would restrict their wedding big date.

Arthur

Allegedly, if good dispensation was sought and you can offered, it would havebeen by among after the, and may appear in the latest correspondingregister book, whether it endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop from York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out-of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop away from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop from Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop off Carlisle 1509-1520

5. In case the 10th Lord Clifford do get married during the early 1487 [state January] andhas Age later on because year, does this new chronology not work?

John fingers?

E born inside later 1487, Henry created into the 1488/nine, Joan into the ,etc. filling out the new brands of your own post of . If (a) thechronology however performs; and you will (b) their particular marriage part was not lower; thenwe simply have the newest 1505 pedigree off Henry VII’s that is inside oppositionto the brand new supposition that she is a american for marriage legitimate daughter.

6. About your 1505 pedigree: Will be Clifford daughters the latest onlyknown Henry VII affairs omitted? Have there been anybody else? In that case,wouldn’t you to definitely reflect badly on this file due to the fact a resource?

Regarding contrasting I have created from the fresh new c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith new 1480-1500 Visitation of your Northern pedigrees, which are

From the c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, new Clifford children are perhaps not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but alternatively on the St. John pedigree. Given that I’mnot regularly the newest St. John loved ones, following is the information asit seems on the c.1505 pedigree, due to the fact extracted from the brand new 1834 Coll. Top. etGen. blog post. The latest phrasing into the quotations is exactly as it appears inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).

« Zero. XII. »Out-of my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other. »f.288, 296, 317, 318. »Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset had about three husbands. » Of the « John Duke ofSomerset » she had « My personal Lady this new King’s Mommy. » that has « The fresh new Queen. » whohad « Prince « From the « Sir Oliver Saint John, very first partner. » she had step 3 daus & dos sons:

A good. « Edith, wedded to help you Geoffrey Rod out of Buckinghamshire. » That they had:A1. « Sir Richard Rod, Knt. wedded to your Woman Margaret, dau. regarding theDuke out-of Clarence. » That they had: « Harry. « A2. « Alianor, married so you can Ralph Verney, Esq. » That they had: « John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[another type of child, unnamed]. »

B. « John Ssint John, esq. » He previously four pupils:B1. « Sir John Saint John, Knight. » that has « Five daughters and oneson. »B2. « Anne, wedd. so you can Harry Lord Clifford. » That they had « Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor. »B3. « E, married in order to Thomas Kent, Esq. regarding Lincolnshire. »B4. « An excellent Nun regarding Shaftesbury. »B5. « Oliver Saint John. »

C. « Dame Mary, wedded to help you Sir Richard Frognall. » They’d:C1. « Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you can sistren. » Which have issueindicated, however called.C2. « Age, wedded in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt. »

D. « Age, wedded very first toward Lord Zouche; once to your LordScrope from Bolton. » Issue:D1. [because of the Zouche]  » Catesby. » They’d: »Elizabeth. George. John. William. »D2. [of the Scrope]  » Conyers. » That have issueindicated although not named.

Margaret Duchess from Somerset, from the « Lionel Lord Welles, last husband. »had: « John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. out of K. Edward IV. » andthey had « Elizabeth. »